Frequencies on Derivative Claims

Having drawn out most of the raw data for the variables I have identified on derivative claims I thought I would publish a few frequency tables from them.

Table A shows claims dismissed for a mandatory bar

Mandatory Bar
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	No	11	73.3	73.3	73.3
	Yes	4	26.7	26.7	100.0
	Total	15	100.0	100.0

Table B shows claims permitted and refused

Permission
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	No	9	60.0	60.0	60.0
	Yes	6	40.0	40.0	100.0
	Total	15	100.0	100.0

Table D shows frequencies for the strength of those cases

Strength of case
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	No reasons for	6	40.0	40.0	40.0
	More reasons against than for	2	13.3	13.3	53.3
	Equal reasons for and against	1	6.7	6.7	60.0
	More reasons for than against	1	6.7	6.7	66.7
	No reasons against	5	33.3	33.3	100.0
	Total	15	100.0	100.0

Table E shows 4 separate categories of the court's deliberation on granting or denying permission. The table represents cases where the case was either: 1) Permission granted with no reasons to dismiss; 2) Permission refused with reasons for permission; 3) Permission granted with reasons to dismiss; 4) Permission refused with no reason for permission. This is determined by whether the court felt a particular consideration under the Companies Act 2006 section 263(3) or other factor was in favour or against the claimant.

Permission Reason Values
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Granted No Against	5	33.3	33.3	33.3
	Refused Against	3	20.0	20.0	53.3
	Granted Against	1	6.7	6.7	60.0
	Refused No Against	6	40.0	40.0	100.0
	Total	15	100.0	100.0