The Boston University Law Review has recently published a series of articles in its journal on fiduciary law.
These publications are the result of a symposium on 'The Role of Fiduciary Law and Trust in the Twenty-First Century'.
Panel 1 publications focused on the nature of fiduciary law and its relationship to other legal doctrines and categories. This panel includes a publication from Prof. DeMott on 'Causation in the Fiduciary Realm'.
Panel 2 was on interdisciplinary views of fiduciary law and includes an excellent article by Sitkoff on the 'Economic Structure of Fiduciary Law' which summarises some of the economic approaches to fiduciary law.
Panel 3 addressed current issues for fiduciary law although I think a more accurate title would have been continuing trends or problems in fiduciary law. Suprisingly there was no specific article on multiple directorships with analysis focusing on issues such as remuneration, public interest and accountability; all of which have been discussed to a large degree.
Finally, panel 4 looked at private servants and private fiduciaries. Perhaps the most relevant one of these papers looked at CEOs and limits on their terms.
Hopefully some of these papers will continue to provide me with valuable insight in to my analysis of directors' fiduciary duties.
These articles can be found on HeinOnline citation (2011) 91 B. U. L. Rev. 833.
These publications are the result of a symposium on 'The Role of Fiduciary Law and Trust in the Twenty-First Century'.
Panel 1 publications focused on the nature of fiduciary law and its relationship to other legal doctrines and categories. This panel includes a publication from Prof. DeMott on 'Causation in the Fiduciary Realm'.
Panel 2 was on interdisciplinary views of fiduciary law and includes an excellent article by Sitkoff on the 'Economic Structure of Fiduciary Law' which summarises some of the economic approaches to fiduciary law.
Panel 3 addressed current issues for fiduciary law although I think a more accurate title would have been continuing trends or problems in fiduciary law. Suprisingly there was no specific article on multiple directorships with analysis focusing on issues such as remuneration, public interest and accountability; all of which have been discussed to a large degree.
Finally, panel 4 looked at private servants and private fiduciaries. Perhaps the most relevant one of these papers looked at CEOs and limits on their terms.
Hopefully some of these papers will continue to provide me with valuable insight in to my analysis of directors' fiduciary duties.
These articles can be found on HeinOnline citation (2011) 91 B. U. L. Rev. 833.
No comments:
Post a Comment